How does disruptive selection lead to speciation

Darwin does not really distinguish among the different forms of selection disruptive, directional, and stabilizing currently recognized. It is unclear exactly when evolutionary biologists distinguished among these three main forms. Pearson deals with the effects of selection on the variances, covariances, and correlations between traits in a quantitative genetic treatment of the subject.

The author does not refer to the forms of selection in this discourse; however, it is clear that he refers to disruptive selection. Wright , a seminal paper on the adaptive landscape, provides a visual depiction of the relationship between fitness and genotypes, but does not distinguish among forms of selection.

However, this author too does not refer to them by their current names. Mather is perhaps the first to define the three currently recognized forms of selection. Darwin, C. On the origin of species by natural selection; or, The preservation of favored races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray. NNNAn impressive and exhaustive tour de force of comparative data outlining the basic mechanics of natural selection.

Disruptive selection is not mentioned by name, but Darwin does discuss how competition could influence the dynamics of selection in a way consistent with modern views of density or frequency dependent selection driving disruptive selection.

Mather, K. The genetical structure of populations. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology — NNNIn this paper Mather clearly distinguishes among the three forms of selection, including disruptive selection. Pearson, K. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution XI: On the influence of natural selection on the variability and correlation of organs. DOI: NNNIn this paper Pearson outlines some of the basic statistical features of understanding selection in a quantitative genetics framework.

Disruptive selection in which selection favours individuals with the smallest and largest values of the trait. These individuals have the highest fitness and individuals with intermediate values are at a fitness disadvantage. One example of this type of selection involves feather colour in male lazuli buntings Passerina amoena , a bird species native to North America Figure 15a. The feather brightness of males varies, ranging from brown to bright blue. In a habitat with limited nesting sites, both the dullest and the brightest yearling males are more successful in obtaining high quality territories and therefore attract females.

This is because adult males tolerate non-threatening dull yearlings and also leave brightly coloured yearlings alone. Because of their dominance, both these groups are able to establish territories and attract females but yearling males with intermediate plumage are attacked by adults and therefore fail to obtain territories and mate Figure 15b.

In the long term, directional selection and disruptive selection can have the most dramatic evolutionary impact and can lead to the formation of a new type from an existing type, the process of speciation. This contrasts with the action of stabilising selection, which maintains the existing type without change in mean phenotype over long periods of time.

Stabilising selection eliminates the extremes in a distribution of phenotypes, and as such it leads to a refinement of the existing type. Because the trait under selection has a genetic basis, the differential reproduction of individuals carrying the genetic variants - the alleles - that underlie the trait e.

Genetic variants that underlie phenotypes that are reproductively successful will increase in frequency, while those that underlie phenotypes that are not successful in reproducing will decrease. Thus, genetic changes across generations result from differences in reproductive success of genetically determined phenotypes. Making the decision to study can be a big step, which is why you'll want a trusted University.

Take a look at all Open University courses. If you are new to University-level study, we offer two introductory routes to our qualifications. You could either choose to start with an Access module , or a module which allows you to count your previous learning towards an Open University qualification.

Read our guide on Where to take your learning next for more information. Not ready for formal University study? In fact, it looks almost like two separate bell curves. There are peaks at both extremes and a very deep valley in the middle, where the average individuals are represented.

Disruptive selection can lead to speciation, with two or more different species forming and the middle-of-the-road individuals being wiped out.

Because of this, it's also called "diversifying selection," and it drives evolution. Like directional selection , disruptive selection can be influenced by human interaction. Environmental pollution can drive disruptive selection to choose different colorings in animals for survival.

Color, in regards to camouflage, serves as a useful example in many different kinds of species, because those individuals that can hide from predators the most effectively will live the longest. If an environment has extremes, those who don't blend into either will be eaten the most quickly, whether they're moths, oysters, toads, birds or another animal.

In rural areas, the peppered moths were almost all a very light color. However, these same moths were very dark in color in industrial areas. Very few medium-colored moths were seen in either location. The darker-colored moths survived predators in the industrial areas by blending in with the polluted surroundings. The lighter moths were seen easily by predators in industrial areas and were eaten. The opposite happened in rural areas.

The medium-colored moths were easily seen in both locations and were therefore very few of them left after disruptive selection. Oysters: Light- and dark-colored oysters could also have a camouflage advantage as opposed to their medium-colored relatives. Light-colored oysters would blend into the rocks in the shallows, and the darkest would blend better into the shadows.

The ones in the intermediate range would show up against either backdrop, offering those oysters no advantage and make them easier prey. Thus, with fewer of the medium individuals surviving to reproduce, the population eventually has more oysters colored to either extreme of the spectrum.

Evolution and speciation isn't all a straight line. Often there are multiple pressures on a group of individuals, or a drought pressure, for example, that is just temporary, so the intermediate individuals don't completely disappear or don't disappear right away. Timeframes in evolution are long. All types of diverging species can coexist if there are enough resources for them all. Specialization in food sources among a population might occur in fits and starts, only when there is some pressure on supply.

Mexican spadefoot toad tadpoles: Spadefoot tadpoles have higher populations in the extremes of their shape, with each type having a more dominant eating pattern.